Market volatility can trigger emotional, and often costly, mistakes for investors. But there’s a simple antidote: aligning your portfolio with your actual cash flow needs and time horizons. When you structure your investments according to the timing of your goals—also known as asset-liability matching—you reduce the risk of reacting poorly during a downturn because you aren’t in a position where you have to sell.
Match Duration to Goals
Each type of investment has an implied “duration”—a period over which you can reasonably expect to break even or earn a return. Thinking in terms of duration helps clarify where different asset classes should live in your financial plan:
- Cash: 0-year duration. Best for immediate needs.
- Bonds: Typically 3–8 years, depending on structure. Good for intermediate-term goals.
- Equities: Best viewed on a 10+ year horizon due to volatility and recovery periods.
When your goals are matched to the right bucket of duration, market declines become background noise. You’re not forced to sell low to meet near-term needs because those are already covered by short-duration assets like cash or bonds.
Risk Tolerance Isn’t Enough
Many investors complete a risk tolerance questionnaire (RTQ) to help determine how much volatility they can stomach. But this can be misleading. RTQs often reflect how you feel in a moment, not your actual financial situation or objectives.
Take this example: an investor marks themselves as “aggressive” on a questionnaire, but they have a 16-year-old heading to college in a year. Should that 529 plan be in aggressive investments? Absolutely not. The goal is imminent, and the funds should be protected from market swings. A goals-based allocation would better reflect their real-world needs.
Real-Life Allocation Examples
Here’s how asset bucketing might look in different life stages:
Scenario 1: Early-Career, Still Working
- Cash: 3–6 months of living expenses
- Equities: Everything else
Rationale: The investor is focused on long-term growth. The cash acts as an emergency fund, and since they don’t plan to withdraw from the equity portion anytime soon, they can ride out market dips.
Scenario 2: Retired or Close to It
- Cash: 2 years of expenses
- Bonds: 5–10 years of expenses
- Equities: The rest
Rationale: Cash covers near-term spending. Bonds refill the cash over time and provide more stability, while equities support long-term growth and legacy goals.
Scenario 3: Working With Mixed-Time Horizon Goals
- Cash: 3–6 months of expenses
- Cash: Kitchen renovation starting next January
- Bonds (e.g., 5-year Treasuries): Down payment for vacation home in 2030
- 529 Plan (50% bonds): Child starts college in 5 years
- Equities: Retirement accounts for a retirement date 15 years away
Rationale: This plan ensures each goal has its own matched bucket. The renovation won’t be impacted by the market. The college and vacation home funds are protected from equity volatility. Retirement savings remain fully invested for long-term growth.
Why This Works in a Down Market
If your portfolio is structured correctly:
- Still Working? A market drop is a chance to buy more shares at a discount.
- Retired or Withdrawing? Your current spending is isolated in cash. It’s unaffected by market movement. Bonds provide a stable bridge to refill that cash, and equities have time to recover before they’re needed.
This strategy doesn’t eliminate volatility, but it eliminates the need to act on it—which is often where the real damage occurs.
Final Thought:
Time is the biggest determinant of how much risk you can and should take. Matching the timing of your goals with the right investment durations keeps you grounded—and keeps your emotions from sabotaging your plan.